Now Khloe Kardashian shows... Khloe Kardashian bares her toned figure in a black bikini... Khloe Kardashian butts into her sister Kim's relationship... EXCLUSIVE: Shapeshifting sisters! Khloe Kardashian flaunts her curves in backless swimsuit and...

However, last month, following months of rumours regarding the state of their marriage, Amanda and Clive issued a joint statement on social media saying they had made 'the difficult decision to separate'.

I recently read a study in which it was found that people can find out a lot of information about you by only looking at your public friends list. Savvy users can adjust their settings to make less things public, but certain information such as your name, friends, and your interests are public and stay that way. This last part is causing the recent consternation.

Is this really the case? Is it so bad to learn that someone you know just purchased a similar book at Barnes & Noble, or also read an article at CNN? However, the answer to the question, "What problems does this raise?" is difficult to find. If you're in hiding from the mafia or the FBI, I can definitely understand your concern. I've applied all the math I can, and the only value of x that I can find is: have a more accurate idea of who you are. We all seem to have the idea that if we put a piece of information online, someone will find it and do x with it. How exactly are the rest of us harmed by Pandora letting your friends know what kind of music you like? I've noticed that all these arguments against facebook rely on a common axiom: Privacy is important.

'Sounds like their surrogate may have been preg already b4 khloe found out about him cheating,' added another person. 'Therefore, he lied to her face while using a surrogate at the same time he knew the other girl was preg & trying to sue him.

Your potential boss will find out that you like to watch Family Guy, listen to Lady Gaga, play football, and read Science Fiction. If you aren't hired on these justifications, I don't think you would have enjoyed the job anyway. Perhaps he will notice from a picture that you sometimes enjoy an adult beverage. Why should you temper your life to better fit someone else's expectations? An example often used to prove privacy's importance is that employers look at the facebook profiles of people they are interviewing.

Anyone with a facebook account can read this note and any part of my profile. I am introverted and not, in general, a very social person. If someone takes the time to look at my account they will find the best possible representation of me, perhaps even better than actually meeting me. On the other hand, my profile is completely public information.

At least the Luddites were angry that they were losing their jobs. One only has to look at Google, Wikipedia, or yes, facebook to find how access to information is a good thing. I'm confident that in a few short years, any information at all will be available to anyone in the world. Think of these implications! In fairness, here's my facebook account The accessibility of information has been increasing ever since the invention of the printing press. Why are you rallying against the expansion of information?

First, some background. People upload photos, talk about themselves, message their friends, and just communicate more than they used to. Since my generation joined (20, 7th Grade math more or less), facebook has changed: likely your boss and grandmother are online, advertisements are targeted to your interests, and most recently, best online reading tutor certain information from your profile is sent to other websites when you visit them. If you don't want to communicate any more than you did ten years ago, you probably didn't create an account. Most people joined Thefacebook as an easy way to stay in contact with family and friends.

Other social media trolls were astonished that the Revenge Body star would even consider having a second child with Tristan, 31, after his repeated infidelities, which left some users wondering where her 'brain' was, though several users also expressed sympathy for Khloé.

It is interesting to note that Jordyn was primarily blamed by the Kardashian family publicly on social media and on KUWTK, with Tristan and his behavior seemingly overlooked. She was 21 at the time while Tristan was 27 and Khloe was 34.

'i think theres a case to be made Tristian Thompson is evil????,' they wrote.

'like he went ahead with the surrogate pregnancy FULLY aware of the fact he was about to have a love child on the side???? @khloekardashian that man HATES you.' Theres levels to that kind of insanity.

Jordyn and her severed connection to the Kardashians was a popular topic among posters. 'Khloe Kardashian said Jordyn Woods ruined her family like Tristan didn't embarrass her every 3 months,' another fan agreed.